NBA 2022 Playoff Schedule 메이저놀이터


We are not a jump shot team!

Now let’s look at the performance aspect. 안전 메이저놀이터 The difference from the 2010s during the dynasty is the main scoring path.

*¹It used to be a clear jump-shooting team (+transition play).

In particular, after the recruitment of superstar Durant above the superstar, the mid-range pull-up jump shot-based production peaked.

As a group with the Splash Brothers, where Curry and Thompson were united, their dependence on the three-point line was also high.

This can be seen in the table of changes in the percentage of field-attempt attempts by region for the final season playoffs below.

This year’s playoffs stimulate the nostalgia for the 2014-16 season model, ‘Original Golden State.

‘ Compared to the 2019 playoffs, the last season with Durant, the percentage of mid-range field throw attempts (MFGA%) decreased by -9.0%.

Instead, the attack is centered on the paint zone and the three-point line, just like when Andrew Bogot and others ate together.

The 45.9% of the paint zone’s you trial share (PFGA%) exceeded 45.2% in the 2015 playoffs, the starting point of the construction of the dynasty.

*²From the opponent’s defense point of view, the Splash Brothers’ three-point line movement check is not an option; it’s a necessity.

However, the eyes of the Golden State players are towards the rim. Therefore, it means a flexible scoring path without pushing too hard on the defensive focus point.

In addition, the opponent’s defense is less dependent on an intuitive pick-and-roll play that is easy to predict.

The share of pick & roll ball handler play of 14.1% compared to the total play type is the lowest among the four teams that made it to the conference finals this year (MIA 19.7%, DAL 19.1%, BOS 16.1%, GSW 14.1%).

Consider the playoff map flow.

*³Literally killer pick-and-roll counter punches dot the court.

Most teams put all their energy into defending the ball handler. In the case of Golden State, it bypasses the defensive focus by rim pick-and-roll roll-man play, cut-in play, 메이저놀이터 주소 etc.

Who defines them as jump-shooting teams?

Like the ‘Original Golden State,’ it was redesigned as a group that can score points in all court areas.

The cut-in play perfection is the greatest weapon. The average of 12.6 attempts per playoff game and 17.1 points per play-based play are all generously ranked first.

A Points Per Possession of 1.36 is also good.

A type that is difficult to utilize due to high expectations for scoring.

It will be established only when all five players on the court thoroughly digest the pre-determined movement.

As you know, motion-based 4:4-5:5 play cannot be imitated by anyone.

What if the offensive side develops in the desired direction?

*⁴The defense side will allow conceding even though they know it.

It is in the same vein that the pass game productivity is excellent 오래된 메이저놀이터.

Superior scoring power is guaranteed without a specific handler holding the ball long.

Average of 281.6 passes per playoff game 5th overall in the league, 15th in possession time per ball touch of 3.02 seconds, and 1st in share (ATP%/ADJ) with 12.6% passes linked to adjusted assists.

It can be seen that the shooting system linked with quick decision-making is operating smoothly.

You can’t set a focus point if your opponent’s defense is good! Let’s take an example.

When Curry plays an on-ball or off-ball screen-based movement, the opponent’s defense focuses on the best jump shooter.

What is noteworthy here is that Golden State’s options for passing and shooting games are limitless.

The green-focused handoff play, Rooney’s pick-and-roll Rollman play, and Wiggins and Thompson’s flair screen-based moving to the position are not focused on the ace scorer.

Of course, a tax (?) says that mistakes are made one after another due to complicated linkage, but there is no problem at all since the income exceeds the tax.

The Offensive Rating (ORtg) number 116.1, which means the expectation of scoring in 100 attack opportunities for the Golden Warriors Corps, is 1st out of 16 teams in the playoffs.

*¹ Charles Barkley said during the 2015 playoffs, “A jump shot team can’t win.” Of course, I was ranting, but I was in trouble.

*² Sometimes putting the 3-point line offensive first. This is when the opponent focuses on defending the space behind the second-three line. This explains why Golden State can take different attack styles depending on the opposing defense. There are plenty of offensive court options.

*³ Dallas also crushed the Phoenix attack with intense front-to-back pressure during the second round of the Western Conference playoffs. However, it did not work against Golden State, which excelled in versatility.

*⁴ Golden State Playoff Restricted Area (RESTRICTED AREA) 72.5% field throw success rate 3rd overall in the league, 1st out of 4 teams that advanced to the conference finals

스포츠토토사이트 Miracle Memphis!

Golden State’s recent finals season PO changes in fielding attempts by the region

2015: PFGA% 45.2% MFGA% 18.6% 3PA% 36.2%

2016: PFGA% 44.4% MFGA% 17.7% 3PA% 37.9%

2017: PFGA% 41.5% MFGA% 20.7% 3PA% 37.8%

2018: PFGA% 39.8% MFGA% 23.7% 3PA% 36.5%

2019: PFGA% 40.4% MFGA% 21.6% 3PA% 38.0%

2022: PFGA% 45.9% MFGA% 12.6% 3PA% 41.5%

*PFGA%/MFGA%/3PA%: Share of each paint zone/mid-range area/3-point line field throw attempts compared to the total field throw attempts

Comparison of cut-in play productivity of the four teams that advanced to the PO Conference Finals 메이저놀이터 목록

GSW: 12.6 attempts (1st place) 17.1 points (1st place) PPP 1.36 points (4th place)

DAL: 3.3 attempts (16th place) 4.3 points (15th place) PPP 1.31 points (7th place)

MIA: 7.6 attempts (6th place) 9.8 points (5th place) PPP 1.28 points (11th place)

BOS: 6.3 attempts (11th place) 9.2 points (7th place) PPP 1.47 points (2nd place)

*In parentheses ( ) are the rankings based on the 16 teams that advanced to the PO.

*PPP: Points Per Possession. Scoring expectations per possession in that play

Comparison of game productivity with the four teams that advanced to the PO conference finals

GSW: 281.6 passes (5th place) SPT 3.02 seconds (15th place) AST% 66.9% (1st place) ATP%/ADJ 12.6% (1st place)

DAL: Pass 256.1 (11th) SPT 3.64 sec (1st) AST% 52.8% (15th) ATP%/ADJ 9.6% (12th)

MIA: 277.2 passes (7th) SPT 3.21 seconds (12th) AST% 58.4% (9th) ATP%/ADJ 9.8% (8th)

BOS: 284.6 passes (3rd place) SPT 3.23 seconds (11th place) AST% 65.6% (2nd place) ATP%/ADJ 10.5% (5th place)

*In parentheses ( ) are the rankings based on the 16 teams that advanced to the PO.

*SPT: avg Sec Per Touch. Retention time per ball touch

*AST%: Occupational share of assists compared to successful field shots

*ATP%/ADJ: Ast To Pass%/ADJustment. Occupancy with Passes Linked to Coordinating Assists

learn from failure

The 2019 playoff final is a memory they want to erase for Golden State fans.

*¹The team that boasted excellent firepower against Cleveland in the 2017-18 Finals backed up in vain against Toronto, which they met in 2019. Even if you consider the variable of departure from the main gun Durant injury, let’s look.

First, Nick Nulls’ 2018-19 season Toronto revolutionized the defense system.

By mobilizing all the defense methods listed in basketball textbooks, such as Box & One, he defeated the difficult enemies Philadelphia (Eastern Conference 2R), Milwaukee (CF), and Golden State (F).

In particular, the use of the ever-changing regional defense left a clear impression.

Moreover, it was a time when another change occurred in the flow of the league, which focused on building the *² switch system.

Golden State manager Steve Kerr 사설토토 메이저놀이터 is being re-evaluated in this year’s playoffs is simple.

Despite being a leader who has had massive success with his system, he has been sensitive to changes in the flow of the league.

Let’s take a look at the defense system of the Golden Warriors Corps.

I had a lot of fun with the switch-included man-to-man and changed the defensive formation in the right place. It is an active benchmarking without burying the pain experienced in 2019.

Against Dallas, which we met on the battlefield of the Conference Finals, the defense of the rim protection area, the reason that covered Curry and Pool, which are vulnerable to the one-to-many matchup, and the offensive, defensive maneuver following the acquisition of *³possession shone. This reminds me of Toronto’s 2019 championship journey.

His superior board grip is also a plus. We made up for the weakness of the small lineup-based rotation operation with a sincere box-out.

The rebound share (TRB) of the regular season’s best five-person lineup was 53.8%, and the figure corresponding to the playoff best five-person lineup was also 57.9%.

*⁴Completion of good defense faithfully kept the thesis of rebounding.

Also, a team with stable defensive rebounds can switch to early offense.

Will there be a team of extreme defensive idiots on the playoff stage of the top-notch competition?

Transition play is the easiest way to bypass the opponent’s tough defense.

One of Golden State’s most robust windows, transition play-based scoring, starts with defensive rebounds.

Briefly summarized, it is a playoff journey in 2022 that emphasizes the strengthening of motion offense-based strengths in attack, active benchmarking in defense, and complementary rebounding competitiveness.

*¹ Gold State 2017 Finals vs CLE ORtg 120.4 (margin +6.1), 2018 Finals vs CLE ORtg 122.8 (margin +17.3) -> 2019 Finals vs TOR ORtg 109.3 (margin –5.6)

*² To ​​put it bluntly, Houston’s banner for the 2017-18 season was an all-switch system-based ‘anti-golden state.’

*³ However, the competitiveness of Golden State’s counterattack situation is inferior compared to the 2010s during the dynasty. It has something to do with Draymond Green’s aging.

*⁴ A firm grip on the board helps prevent second chance runs.

Golden State Season & PO Best Lineup Defensive Index 메이저놀이터 순위


Curry + Pool + Wiggins + Green + Rooney (347 minutes): DRtg 104.0 TRB% 53.8% FG 44.3%


Curry + Thompson + Wiggins + Green + Rooney (105 minutes): DRtg 101.4 TRB% 57.9% FG 39.5%

*DRtg: Expectation to conceded in 100 defensive opportunities

*TRB%: Rebound share

Golden State 2019 vs. 2022 PO Rebound Competitiveness Change

2019: ORB% 30.1% DRB% 71.4% Second chance 13.7 runs (margin +0.7 points)

2022: ORB% 28.2% DRB% 74.1% Second chance 12.7 runs (margin +1.8 points)

*ORB%/DRB%: Occupational share of attack/defense rebounds, respectively

스포츠토토사이트 Miracle Memphis!


스포츠토토사이트 Western Conference 2nd seed Memphis played a double play against 7th seed Minnesota. Twice in the first round face-to-face series, they won by overcoming their inferiority by more than 10 points in the 4th quarter! Starring All-Star Point Guard Zah Morant, Supporting Backup Big Man Brandon Clark. In particular, Morant’s driving Tomahawk Slam Dunk at the end of the third quarter served as a catalyst. Perhaps the best slam dunk in NBA playoff history.

Western Conference 1st seed Phoenix also had a 3-2 lead in the series against 8th seed New Orleans in the first round. The league’s fourth-year forward, Mikal Bridges, showed an excellent airborne balance.

East Conference 1st seed Miami defeated 8th seed Atlanta and advanced to the 2nd round. 스포츠토토사이트 Round 2 opponents are 4th seed Philadelphia or 5th seed Toronto (current PHI 3-2 series lead).

Memphis Grizzlies (3-2) 111-109 Minnesota Timberwolves (2-3)


Ja Morant 30 points, 13 rebounds, nine assists FT 11/17

Brandon Clark: 21 points, 15 rebounds.

Desmond Main: 25 points, four rebounds, 3 PMs.


Karl-Anthony Towns 28 points, 12 rebounds, three steals, five 3PMs

Anthony Edwards 22 points, 3 PM, 3

D’Angelo Russell had 12 points and eight assists.

1st Quarter: 28-31

2nd Quarter: 25-24

3rd Quarter: 21-30

4th Quarter: 37-24

Series stats (Western 2nd seed vs. 7th seed)

1st leg: MEM (loss) 117-130 MIN (win)

Second leg: MEM (win) 124-96 MIN (loss)

Game 3 : MIN (L) 95-104 MEM (Win)

Game 4 : MIN (win) 119-118 MEM (loss)

Game 5 : MEM (Win) 111-109 MIN (Loss)

Game 6 : April 29 MIN (home)

*Game 7 will be conducted if necessary

Memphis once again made a comeback in their playoff round 1 head-to-head series against Minnesota.스포츠토토사이트모바일 *¹The 3rd game was 26 points, and today’s 5th game reversed the lead, up to 13 points at the beginning of the 4th quarter. Only two teams in NBA playoff history have experienced comeback wins by over 10 points or more in the fourth quarter of a single series *² Miami in 2020 and Memphis in 2022. The grizzly fighting spirit of the wolf corps seems to be ferociously biting on the problem of the wolf corps’ lack of rear heart.

Minnesota suffered an absurd comeback. This may have been foretold at the time of the catastrophic defeat in Game 3 of the series. *³Even if they lead by a large gap, they suffer from anxiety that they can allow a comeback at any time. What if I can’t overcome the trauma even in Game 6, which will be held after a day off? The dream of qualifying for the second round of the playoffs for the first time since 2004, during the Kevin Garnett era, is also disappearing.

*¹ Memphis lost more than 25 points in Game 3 of the series twice. Minnesota deserves to be traumatized.

*² Miami played a myriad of 4th quarter reversals during the 2020 playoffs. This was when Jimmy Butler earned the honorary title of ‘Playoff Ace.’

*³ Minnesota couldn’t even run away from the court in Game 1 and Game 4 of the winning series.

안전한 스포츠토토사이트 AGAIN GAME 3. Memphis series win-win list

3rd first half: 26 points at the beginning of the 2nd quarter -> Chase up to 7 points at the end of the 2nd quarter

The second half of the 3rd game: 25 points inferior in the middle of the 3rd game -> The final victory by 9 points

Game 5: 13 points in the middle of the 4th quarter -> 2 points to win the final match

The game proceeded in a flow where Minnesota fled, and Memphis struggled to pursue it. This is also the pattern that has been maintained throughout the series, excluding the second game. The driving force that allowed the away team to dominate the court, albeit slightly, was the pick-and-roll play-based 3-point line offensive. After guiding the opponent’s defensive focus toward the ball handler, he provided quick decompression passes to shooters maneuvered into the open space. The number of successful 3-point shots in the first quarter (3P 7/11, 3 PM margin +5) proves it. The scene where Carl-Anthony Towns hit 5 out of 7 3-point attempts is noteworthy. Instead of the aforementioned linked play, he broke the defensive line outside the home team with three pull-up stores based on individual tactics.

However, the away team could not replace the offensive flow with a big run.

It was because he had made too many unforced mistakes. *¹I was trying to avoid the negative defensive pressure with quick decision making, but only my hands and feet got dizzy. It means that the 3-point line direction decompression pass did not proceed as neatly as it was. To make matters worse, he also dedicated 18 offensive rebounds. *²Loss while preventing Memphis ace Ja Morant from breaking through the dribble. A dense 1-3-1 or 3-2 formation zone defense has a high probability of causing rebound weakness. The Memphis squad is filled with energizer resources, such as Brandon Clark, who are familiar with off-ball situations and rim-direction dashes. As a result of Minnesota’s use of tactics with clear pros and cons, the margin of scoring opportunities (FGA+FGA) between the two teams is widened up to 26 (!) (131 MEM – 107 MIN). *³This is the background that Memphis was able to make up for with more scoring opportunities.

On the other hand, foul trouble is a hot topic in the first round of the playoff match series. Memphis averaged 23.6 fouls per game, 11th overall, and Minnesota 28.0 last (first-place CHI 18.8). As it was a matchup between young and dynamic teams, fouls were frequent due to frequent physical contact. In both cases, improper management has emerged as a critical variable. In particular, the competition between Towns and Jaren Jackson Jr. is fierce. Minnesota lost all three games in the series, with Towns committing five fouls. If you fall into the swamp of early foul trouble, your movements will inevitably be reduced. So is Patrick Beverly, the ‘mad dog.’ He was aggressive in the point guard matchup with Morant, and frequent fouls followed. Today’s game five-double defeat also occurred with Beverly’s six foul-outs.

*¹ Minnesota’s 23 errors tonight are the most in a single playoff game in the club’s history. He made four mistakes in 3:30 in the first quarter, so he said it all.

*² Minnesota’s Ja Morant defense is clearly showing strength. Morant’s regular-season average dribble break-through-based 14.8 points per game, the share of issues generated (PTS%) of 70.8%. In the playoffs, the surprising number decreased to 11.3 points and 54.9% PTS%. Compared to the regular season, dribble break-based pass share increased by +4.4%. Except for the 4th quarter of today’s game, it can be seen that the game has switched to passive play. As a result, the assist number increased significantly.

*³ Memphis Paint Zone score +24 points and second chance margin +17 points. A second chance near the rim became the basis for the pursuit and reverse play.

Compare two teams to score chances.

Scoring Chance: 131 MEM vs 107 MIN

TS% : MEM 49.9% vs MIN 58.3%

ORB: 18 MEM vs 6 MIN

DRB%: MEM 76.6% vs MIN 66.7%

Second Chance: MEM 23 points vs MIN 6 points

Mistake caused: 23 MEM vs 17 MIN

TOV% : MEM 15.0% vs MIN 21.1%

Error base: MEM 23 points vs MIN 17 points

*Scoring Chance: FGA+FTA

*DRB%: Occupation of defensive rebounds

*TOV%: Share of error occurrence

Karl-Anthony Towns Series Grade Changes

1st leg (43 minutes/win): 29 points, 13 rebounds, 3 assists/3 errors FG 61.1% FT 5/5 3 fouls

Second leg (28 min/loss): 15 points, 11 rebounds, 1 assist, 5 errors, FG 57.1% FT 7/8 5 fouls

Game 3 (33 mins/loss): 8 points, 5 rebounds, 1 assist, 4 errors, FG 75.0% FT 2/2 5 fouls

Game 4 (42 minutes/win): 33 points, 14 rebounds, 3 assists, 6 errors FG 47.1% FT 14/17 3 fouls

Game 5 (35 minutes/loss): 28 points, 12 rebounds, 1 assist/7 errors FG 46.7% FT 9/9 5 fouls

*If you avoid early foul trouble, excellent performance + and team victory are guaranteed.

A list of foul industry blue-chip stocks. PO Cumulative Foul Rankings

1st place: Jaren Jackson Jr. (MEM, 113 minutes): 26

2nd place Patrick Beverly (MIN, 156 minutes): 22

3rd Karl-Anthony Towns (MIN, 181 minutes): 21

*Jackson Jr. regular season cumulative fouls 2nd overall with 272 leagues, 3rd with 267 towns. Jagang Ducheon is my friend.

Before the end of the third quarter, Morant blew a driving Tomahawk slam dunk that would go down in NBA history. This is the best highlight film of today’s match, as Malik Beasley, who went out to induce charging, did not even dare to protest that it was an attacker foul. What is noteworthy is that Morant succeeded in reversing the atmosphere through the play. In fact, in the 4th quarter, he did not think as complicated as in the previous quarter. Still, he switched to an unlimited dribble breakthrough attack that slammed into the opponent’s paint zone protection defense. *¹The tough matchup Beverly was also removed with the 6th foul, which was also a good thing.

Let’s look at the quarter-by-quarter performance change of Grizzly Corps aces. 1st to 3rd quarter 12 points, nine assists (5 errors), field throw success rate 38.5% (FT 2/7) Normal (?) point guard type figures *² 18 points, 0 assists (0 errors), field throw success rate in the 4th quarter 44.4% (FT 9/10) switched to the sharp driver type. It can be seen that they pounded into the opponent’s dense defensive formation without fear. Morant’s dribbling breakthrough devastated the Minnesota defense, which had relapsed with foul trouble.

In addition, Clark painstakingly dug into the space behind Morant’s attack movement.

If a teammate’s shot succeeded, they switched defense, and if they failed, they immediately joined the offensive rebound fight. He has a good memory of showing off an excellent offensive rebound + second chance combination in the process of directing a double play in Game 3 of the series. Team-level pursuit Keeping the flow was also possible thanks to Clark making up 150% of the gap following Jaren Jackson Jr.’s foul out. Clark Hana is the only player in Memphis team history to create a double-double with 20 points, 15 rebounds (ORB), and a success rate of 60.0% or more in a single playoff game. This is an area that even all-star seniors such as Gasol Brothers and Jack Randolph could not reach.

Morant also led the final offensive at the end of the fourth quarter. *²Team was responsible for all the last 13 goals scored in that quarter! The 3-point shot from the comeback, taken one minute and three seconds before the end of the game, was a dagger shot into the heart of Minnesota’s defense. The score report for the 3-point line between the 1st and 3rd quarters was three attempts and 0. Ace’s strong heart stands out even more on the clutch court. 실시간 스포츠토토사이트 바로가기

The away team barely breathed a sigh of relief with a three-point shot from the equalizing corner 3.7 seconds before the end of second-year league star Anthony Edwards. The group, which played a lot of erroneous play throughout the 47th minute, finished neatly as much as the last inbound pass-based attack development. However, the main character of today’s game has not changed. In the counterattack that followed, Morant exploded the score to break through the reversal of the final 1.0 seconds before the end! A 22-year-old young man born in 1999’s bold dribbling forward + acrobatic finish near the rim + *³ Minnesota defensive mistake is an evaluation that perfectly matched the triple. *⁴Morant’s 18 points in the fourth quarter is also a new club playoff record.

*¹ Patrick Beverly provoked Zamorant, the Memphis squad, and even Memphis fans without a break during the on-court time. It’s a familiar scene.

*² Ja Morant also brushed off the sluggish free throw line he had suffered until the third quarter in the fourth quarter.

*³ Anthony Edwards had a gambled deflection move in his final defense. Result? He opened up a dribble breakout path for matchup Morant.

*⁴ As of the 21st-century playoffs, the most goals scored in the fourth quarter are 26 points, set by Allen Iverson against Milwaukee in June 2001. Coincidentally, Ja Morant is the 2020s Young Gun All-Star, reminiscent of Iverson.

Memphis’s 4th quarterfinals play a double play.

Quarter 1:46: Towns 3-pointer, McLaughlin AST (102-106)

Quarter 1:41: Morant chases free throw to score (104-106)

Quarter 1:3: Clark ORB -> Morant 3-point shot from the back (107-106)

Quarter 49.3 sec: Towns error & Jones Steele

Quarter 25.4 seconds: Clark ORB -> Maintain lead situation attack possession time

8.2 seconds in the quarter: Morant scores a free throw (109-106)

Quarter 3.7 seconds: Edwards tied 3-pointer, McLaughlin AST (109-109)

Quarter 1.0 seconds: Morant’s final reversal breakout score, Brooks AST (111-109)

Match End: Towns try to come back and fails the 3-point shot.

Comparison of productivity between the two teams in the last 9 minutes and 30 seconds of the 4th quarter

MEM: 32 points, 7 ORB, five assists, two errors FG 47.4% 3P 3/7 FT 11/13 Second chance 9 points

MIN: 17 points, 3 ORB, 4 assists/3 errors FG 29.4% 3P 2/7 FT 5/5 second chance 0 points

Zamorano Quarterly Grade Changes

1st – 3rd Quarter: 12 points, 11 rebounds, 9 assists, 5 errors FG 38.5% 3P 0/3 FT 2/7

4th Quarter: 13 points, 2 rebounds, 0 assists, 0 errors FG 44.4% 3P 1/1 FT 9/10

Miami Heat (4-1) 97-94 Atlanta Hawks (1-4)


Bam Adebayo 20 points, 11 rebounds, four assists

Victor Oladipo 23 points, three steals, 3 PMs

Max Struth 15 points, five rebounds, 3 PMs


DeAndre Hunter 35 points, 11 rebounds, three steals, 3 PM, 3 FT 10/11

Tray Young: 11 points, 8 rebounds, 6 assists

Danilo Galinari 12 points, 2 3PMs

1st Quarter: 21-22

2nd Quarter: 33-20

3rd Quarter: 21-22

4th Quarter: 22-30

Series stats (East 1st seed vs. 8th seed)

1st leg: MIA (win) 115-91 ATL (loss)

Second leg: MIA (win) 115-105 ATL (loss)

Game 3 : ATL (win) 111-110 MIA (loss)

Game 4 : ATL (L) 86-110 MIA (Win)

Game 5 : MIA (win) 97-94 ATL (loss)