Author Topic: Audeze LCD3 first impressions  (Read 7258 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sperandeo

  • Roadie
  • Posts: 218
    • Gear forum
Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« on: October 16, 2011, 12:35:21 PM »
Well the LCD3 have been at the CanJam show in Denver and I hear they stole the show!!

Here is one reviewers impression:

Speaking of über-performance, the Audeze LCD-3 is quite possibly the best dynamic headphone ever, to my ears.  Whereas the best Sennheiser HD 800 rigs I've heard have--in my opinion, to my ears--trumped even the best I could wring from the likes of the HiFiMAN HE-6, HE-500, and Audeze LCD-2, the new LCD-3 is now my new top dynamic headphone choice.  And, frankly, I'm going to see if I can side-by-side it with the Stax SR-009 here, not because I'm expecting it to necessarily beat the SR-009, but because I think this is one headphone that could give it a run.  I already know there are some things it does better than the electrostatic headphone I've called my personal choice for best in the world.

Lest you think I've formed this impression in louder-than-ideal meet conditions, I want to make clear that I've absconded with the LCD-3 to my hotel room for two nights in a row, in addition to meet listening.  I have now had two nearly sleepless nights with the Audeze LCD-3 balanced out of my favorite full-size-headphone-driving portable rig, consisting of iPod-->Cyper Labs Algorhythm Solo-->Ray Samuels SR-71b, driving the Audeze LCD-3 balanced via a Moon Audio Silver Dragon headphone cable.  I missed dinner my first night here (and so had to make a late-night fast food run), and ordered in room service last night--and, again, I've hardly slept.  Yes, I've been listening a lot.

I know--the LCD-3 looks like a modified LCD-2.  It is not that.  It's not just prettier wood and super-soft earpads.  It's a whole new driver.  The diaphragm is a lot lighter than the LCD-2's.  The magnet structure is new.  It has a sound that LCD-2 aficionados might call familial, but the performance is no doubt better, in every respect, to my ears.  Simply put, you buy the LCD-2 and you get the LCD-2 (an outstanding headphone, by any measure).  You buy the LCD-3, you get the LCD-3.  I'm a guy who's purchased four LCD-2's (two rev 1's and two rev 2's), so I think I can say this with some amount of credence.

Starting with the bass, the impact and detail is simply otherworldly, and especially where I can't imagine even the SR-009 trumping it.  One of Drew Baird's favorite test tracks is "Company" from Patricia Barber's Modern Cool album, and we were both simply floored by the LCD-3's physicality with Michael Arnopol's bass and Mark Walker's drums.  No other headphone I can think of can wring this level of tremendous low-end corporeality without bloat--the sense of this wrung not only from energy, but detail.  When you sense the finest of textures and timbre down low, combined with this driver's clear ability to convey physical impact...well, that's just standard-setting bass to my ears.

LCD-3 midrange performance is similarly stellar, with hints of bloom, but never unnatural, never exaggerated.  And the treble soars, delicate, shimmering, extended.  Whereas some thought the LCD-2 (rev 1) treble needed some lift and more presence, I do not expect anyone to level this complaint at the LCD-3.  Throughout the audible range, the LCD-3 trumps the LCD-2 (and just about everything else) in terms of sheer detail retrieval, so its timbral accuracy throughout is freaky good.  And it does all this in sibilance- and harshness-free Audeze fashion.

Am I buying one?  What do you think?  I can't imagine I'll be leaving this show without one, even if it takes an act of larceny to make it happen (which is essentially what I've now committed two nights in a row).




Audeze LCD-2 / Schiit Lyr / M-Audio ie10 / iDecco / CmoyBB / TTVJ Millett Hybrid Amp/ iPod Classic 160GB, Solo, Squeezebox Touch, Beyerdynamic DT-1350
My Gear forum is : http://www.gearphile.com

Offline KaliKot

  • Badass Head-phile
  • Posts: 3325
  • :3
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2011, 12:41:50 PM »
The price is ridiculous but the impressions look like they're actually worth that much :o

Still though the best test is the test of time. I don't really believe inital hype that much until i've heard one
If it looks bad CF it, If it sounds bad DENKO it!

Offline sperandeo

  • Roadie
  • Posts: 218
    • Gear forum
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2011, 12:47:31 PM »
If these are being compared to stax009, then $2000.00 is a STEAL!!!

Audeze LCD-2 / Schiit Lyr / M-Audio ie10 / iDecco / CmoyBB / TTVJ Millett Hybrid Amp/ iPod Classic 160GB, Solo, Squeezebox Touch, Beyerdynamic DT-1350
My Gear forum is : http://www.gearphile.com

Offline marcusd

  • The UWA
  • Admin
  • Posts: 9225
    • Headfonics
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2011, 12:50:57 PM »
I would tread with caution as the reviewer is showing where his sq tastes lie with this phrase:

Whereas the best Sennheiser HD 800 rigs I've heard have--in my opinion, to my ears--trumped even the best I could wring from the likes of the HiFiMAN HE-6, HE-500, and Audeze LCD-2

This is not related in anyway to how good the or not good the lcd-2 is but more to do with the contention that an HD800 setup is superior to the lcd-2, and he500/6 which is just utter BS in my book.
♫♪♫d(^_^)♫♪♫


Offline reorx

  • Roadie
  • Posts: 314
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #4 on: October 16, 2011, 03:01:50 PM »
wait, the LCD-3 is dynamic?

Save for the R10s, is this the most expensive dynamic cans, like, evar?

Who's the head-fi reviewer who wrote this? I havent visited head-fi in a while, but i think i still know which reviewers to trust, and which ones not only drink, but swim in the kool-aid  :P

Offline airwax

  • Badass Head-phile
  • Posts: 3162
  • Money for nothing...
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #5 on: October 16, 2011, 03:44:55 PM »
Well jude has been doing this for awhile, and I'm not really that fond of his reviews.
"The Music Continues to live on"

Offline Peorth

  • Hardcore Dude
  • Posts: 569
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #6 on: October 16, 2011, 03:48:30 PM »
I wonder if anyone here is adventurous enough (and with extra deep pockets to boot) to actually buy the LCD-3 so people can actually audition it for themselves?  8)

Offline Dyaems

  • Badass Head-phile
  • Posts: 2237
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #7 on: October 16, 2011, 08:23:24 PM »
you! hehehehe!

if it does really match with the 009, although i will never hear the 009 ever.. i guess the lcd3 might be actually worth it....?

Offline Peorth

  • Hardcore Dude
  • Posts: 569
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #8 on: October 16, 2011, 08:29:07 PM »
If I win the lotto, I'll be sure to buy an LCD-3  ;D

Anyway, I also have the same question as reorx, why did the reviewer say it was "dynamic?" Could he be referring to "orthodynamic" instead?

Offline donunus

  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2978
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #9 on: October 16, 2011, 09:00:27 PM »

This is not related in anyway to how good the or not good the lcd-2 is but more to do with the contention that an HD800 setup is superior to the lcd-2, and he500/6 which is just utter BS in my book.

You haven't heard the hd800s like these guys do though. They have $4,000 amps to run the bastard LOL

Offline Collie

  • Badass Head-phile
  • Posts: 2736
  • Dark = Good!!
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #10 on: October 16, 2011, 09:08:08 PM »
Orthodynamic still falls under the umbrella term "dynamic".

Offline marcusd

  • The UWA
  • Admin
  • Posts: 9225
    • Headfonics
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #11 on: October 16, 2011, 09:15:06 PM »
You haven't heard the hd800s like these guys do though. They have $4,000 amps to run the bastard LOL

I heard it out of a $2k amp alongside an lcd-2 and a HE6 - does this count? ;)
♫♪♫d(^_^)♫♪♫


Offline Collie

  • Badass Head-phile
  • Posts: 2736
  • Dark = Good!!
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #12 on: October 16, 2011, 09:18:25 PM »
Don't forget to account for taste, as I preferred the LCD2 over the HD800, but liked the HD800 over the HE6.  ;)

Offline Mikado

  • Weaponized Admin
  • Posts: 2946
  • By any means
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #13 on: October 16, 2011, 09:19:32 PM »
I heard it out of a $2k amp alongside an lcd-2 and a HE6 - does this count? ;)

Seconded, heheh. :P

Orthodynamic still falls under the umbrella term "dynamic".

Technically yes it's still a dynamic, the implementation though is just slightly different.
The way our bro  posts is akin to a caffein overloaded Energizer Bunny on steroids who suddenly decided to pop speed pills while downing a dozen bottles of Red Bull! ;D

Offline Tsundere

  • Roadie
  • Posts: 130
Re: Audeze LCD3 first impressions
« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2011, 09:21:40 PM »
I'm really hoping that Sennheiser and the others are not planning to follow this trend by slapping a 2000$-3000$ price tag on their new flagships.