Author Topic: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review  (Read 5731 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dalethorn

  • Banhammered!
  • Posts: 1241
    • DaleThorn.com
Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« on: April 14, 2011, 06:36:10 AM »
Comparing the DT-1350 to the Sennheiser HD-800 and Beyer DT-48E (2011 version), the DT-1350 has a very pronounced emphasis in the "AWWWWWW" region of the midrange, while the HD-800 has a mild emphasis in the "EHHHHHH" to "EEEEEEE" region, and the DT-48E a mild emphasis about halfway between those two. The headphone I have on hand that most closely matches the midrange sound of the DT-1350 is the Sennheiser PX-100-II (modified to remove the center of the foam cushions), and while the PX-100-II has less of the midrange emphasis than the   DT-1350, the DT-1350 has greater clarity and high-end extension which is to be expected given its price range.

Bass with the DT-1350 is similar to the HD-800, but somewhat stronger in the 40 to 60 hz region. People who like "full strength" bass should like the DT-1350, since the bass is strong without being excessive or boomy. Bass detail is very good with the DT-1350, and is strong and clear down to 32 hz or lower.

The DT-1350's highs are smooth and comparable to the HD-800. One of the things I compared was part of Beethoven's 9th symphony, 4th movement (Solti/Chicago/1972) following the first vocal break where there are some triangle sounds that resolve very well on both headphones.

My overall conclusion is that the DT-1350 sounds more forward in the midrange around 400 hz or so compared to the HD-800 and DT-48E, yet has smooth and detailed bass and highs, and so will likely appeal to people who find headphones like the HD-800 too laid back and polite, or too bright in the upper midrange. One thing I especially like with the DT-1350 is how the bass has some of that "reach out and grab you" visceral impact, which few headphones can duplicate and still be fairly tight and detailed.

I can't comment on the design of the DT-1350 for studio or professional use, but the thin cord doesn't seem strong enough to withstand the kind of yanking and tugging that occur in those arenas. Comfort is good from the first moments, since the headband has a wide range of adjustment, the right amount of pressure to keep the headphone secure when moving around, and soft earpads that don't pinch the outer ear parts.

The 80-ohm impedance of the DT-1350 didn't seem to be a factor in my tests, since I got good volume and essentially the same frequency response whether playing from iPod, iPad, or headphone amp from the iPod "line out" dock connector.

In addition to the pop music tracks listed below, which I used mainly for detecting weaknesses or other problems with the sound, I played a wide variety of genres (Jazz, Diana Krall, Bill Evans Trio; Bach organ, Biggs; Beethoven 9th, Solti CSO; Chopin, Moravec; Reggae, Marley, Tosh; Country, Haggard, Yoakam; Verdi, Domingo; Sinatra and Bennett; Punk, Germs, Fear, Sid Vicious, Social Distortion; Medieval, Madrigali, Medieval Babes; Trance, Mylene Farmer, etc.)

The following are some of the music tracks I tested with, and the main features I listened for with those tracks:

Blues Project - Caress Me Baby (piercing guitar sound, handled well).
Cocteau Twins - Carolyn's Fingers (guitar string detail and quality, very good).
Commodores - Night Shift (bass detail, very good).
Germs - Forming (raw garage sound, excellent).
Lick The Tins - Can't Help Falling In Love (tin whistle, very clear and clean).
Lou Reed - Walk On The Wild Side (bass impact and detail, excellent).
REM - Radio Free Europe (drum impact, very good).
Rolling Stones - She's So Cold (bass impact and guitar sound, very good).
U2 - With Or Without You (bass slightly boomy; high-pitched instruments/sibilants handled well).
Van Morrison - Into The Mystic (bass, moderate).
Who - Bargain (voice trailing off: "best I ever had", good vocal harmonics).
"Admit nothing.  Deny everything.  Demand proof, then refuse to accept it" -- CIA manual.

Offline dalethorn

  • Banhammered!
  • Posts: 1241
    • DaleThorn.com
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2011, 06:37:11 AM »
Well, that's my first go at the 1350 - I will have to see if there is any change with time, i.e. burn-in or whatever.
"Admit nothing.  Deny everything.  Demand proof, then refuse to accept it" -- CIA manual.

Offline H a R 0

  • Audio Meister
  • Posts: 816
  • Audiophile Trasher
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2011, 06:45:51 AM »
what's your source and the dac / amp used during the review bro? :)
ALAC / FLAC -  iPhone 4S / HM601 Slim - UM Mage

Offline dalethorn

  • Banhammered!
  • Posts: 1241
    • DaleThorn.com
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2011, 07:12:38 AM »
what's your source and the dac / amp used during the review bro? :)

I used the iPod Touch latest and the original iPad, feeding the Cute Beyond class A amp using the Apple composite video cable.  I use MP3's, mostly 128 to 256k, and a lot of those MP3's have flaws, so I either don't use them or I know how to avoid the bad parts.
"Admit nothing.  Deny everything.  Demand proof, then refuse to accept it" -- CIA manual.

Offline Racio

  • La Messia di Ritmo
  • Posts: 3809
  • Have you fed your soul lately?...
    • Team Woody!!!
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2011, 11:12:55 AM »
^Interesting cans. These phones must be the "silent" upgrade/improved model over the somewhat lean sounding T50p. Thanks for sharing Dale, I bet Marcus is already salivating to lay his ears on these Beyers. :))
H e a d - F i      P r o f i l e
music ---> ears ---> soul
(   (  ( (( d(o_O)b )) )  )   )

Offline marcusd

  • The UWA
  • Admin
  • Posts: 9225
    • Headfonics
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #5 on: April 14, 2011, 11:19:11 AM »
^Interesting cans. These phones must be the "silent" upgrade/improved model over the somewhat lean sounding T50p. Thanks for sharing Dale, I bet Marcus is already salivating to lay his ears on these Beyers. :))

 :-\

umm.. so Dale you don't like them then eh? :P
« Last Edit: April 14, 2011, 11:21:03 AM by marcusd »
♫♪♫d(^_^)♫♪♫


Offline dalethorn

  • Banhammered!
  • Posts: 1241
    • DaleThorn.com
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #6 on: April 14, 2011, 11:59:06 AM »
:-\
umm.. so Dale you don't like them then eh? :P

Too early to tell, of course.  What I hinted at in the review I can say plainly here.  When I compared to the Senn HD-800 or Beyer DT-48E, the DT-1350 sounded extremely hollow in comparison, as if there were a huge peak in the midrange around 400-500 hz.  But since my taste in headphones has been mostly those that lean toward the brighter midranges like the DT-48E, the HD-800, and the PX-200-II, it means my music selections for listening and testing have favored those 'phones.  So during the next few days, I will listen to different tunes on the DT-1350 and see how they stack up on their own.  Also whether there are any sonic changes due to burn-in or whatever.  Then I'll re-compare to the big iron and see if I still feel that they have a major coloration in the midrange.  Since B&H is selling these on a no-return for any reason basis, I think people need to be very careful that they really want them before they buy.  One interesting thing is they sound pretty much identical whether running from the headphone jack of the iPod Touch or iPad, or running from the iPod dock connector line out to the Cute Beyond headphone amp.
"Admit nothing.  Deny everything.  Demand proof, then refuse to accept it" -- CIA manual.

Offline marcusd

  • The UWA
  • Admin
  • Posts: 9225
    • Headfonics
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2011, 12:02:53 PM »
well line me up then if you consider them redundant to your listening needs after further review ;)
♫♪♫d(^_^)♫♪♫


Offline dalethorn

  • Banhammered!
  • Posts: 1241
    • DaleThorn.com
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2011, 09:13:38 PM »
Here's a fun experiment hee hee: I posted the first DT-1350 review here at 06:36, followed by postings on 6 other sites (except Head-Fi), and there were many users on Head-Fi who were anxious to read an actual user review before ordering.  But so far nobody has discovered the reviews, even though they're on page one of Google searches.  I thought everyone used Google.  Maybe not.
"Admit nothing.  Deny everything.  Demand proof, then refuse to accept it" -- CIA manual.

Offline marcusd

  • The UWA
  • Admin
  • Posts: 9225
    • Headfonics
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2011, 09:33:29 PM »
Here's a fun experiment hee hee: I posted the first DT-1350 review here at 06:36, followed by postings on 6 other sites (except Head-Fi), and there were many users on Head-Fi who were anxious to read an actual user review before ordering.  But so far nobody has discovered the reviews, even though they're on page one of Google searches.  I thought everyone used Google.  Maybe not.

Maybe they are a little world weary with the 1000+ posts a day on headfi and no easy way of finding them. Their Loss Dale, our gain ;)
♫♪♫d(^_^)♫♪♫


Offline dalethorn

  • Banhammered!
  • Posts: 1241
    • DaleThorn.com
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #10 on: April 14, 2011, 11:43:19 PM »
Maybe they are a little world weary with the 1000+ posts a day on headfi and no easy way of finding them. Their Loss Dale, our gain ;)
I'm down with that!  Headphiles is like a condensed digest of the best postings.
"Admit nothing.  Deny everything.  Demand proof, then refuse to accept it" -- CIA manual.

Offline marcusd

  • The UWA
  • Admin
  • Posts: 9225
    • Headfonics
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #11 on: April 14, 2011, 11:44:56 PM »
I'm down with that!  Headphiles is like a condensed digest of the best postings.

or headfi is the padded version of us - hehe.. I must tap Beyer SG to see if they will loan me a unit or something sometime soon. Otherwise it will be a long wait :(
♫♪♫d(^_^)♫♪♫


Offline dalethorn

  • Banhammered!
  • Posts: 1241
    • DaleThorn.com
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #12 on: April 14, 2011, 11:50:27 PM »
This is really hard to say, because my perspective of hifi is so wrapped up in the HD-800 and DT-48E, and I didn't listen to the PX-100-II for very long.  But, if you listen to the DT-1350 for a few days, then put the other 'phones I mentioned back on, it's like most of the sound disappears.

So, I ain't sayin' what's right, what's the best, or anything else.  Just sayin', that's all.
"Admit nothing.  Deny everything.  Demand proof, then refuse to accept it" -- CIA manual.

Offline marcusd

  • The UWA
  • Admin
  • Posts: 9225
    • Headfonics
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #13 on: April 14, 2011, 11:53:51 PM »
This is really hard to say, because my perspective of hifi is so wrapped up in the HD-800 and DT-48E, and I didn't listen to the PX-100-II for very long.  But, if you listen to the DT-1350 for a few days, then put the other 'phones I mentioned back on, it's like most of the sound disappears.

So, I ain't sayin' what's right, what's the best, or anything else.  Just sayin', that's all.

That might be the Tesla effect Dale. I had that T50p for a few months and just loved the exquisite way it handled detail on some of my Sting reference tracks, it seems to paint a very vivid picture in my mind of each note. Nimble in the upper range to say the least.
♫♪♫d(^_^)♫♪♫


Offline sherwino

  • Invalid Last Name
  • Posts: 1322
  • Closed & Portable Please
Re: Beyerdynamic DT-1350 Review
« Reply #14 on: April 14, 2011, 11:57:41 PM »
This is very much interesting and something definitely worth following marcus!