Westone 4

[mbc0528]

^ill have to agree to dinkoy for that bro 2rooi.
you will...
i know.

hahaha.

[daniel050489]

grats bro!
any comparison esp on the bass department?

[2rooi123]

grats bro!
any comparison esp on the bass department?

its very deep,tight, and never bloated. easily the most controlled universal ive owned

[daniel050489]

its very deep,tight, and never bloated. easily the most controlled universal ive owned

thanks bro 

[x_walkman]

its very deep,tight, and never bloated. easily the most controlled universal ive owned

kindly specify the strengths and weaknesses based from:

bass
mids
treble
soundstage

also hows the mids of w4 against fx700, is it more upfront?

might go to in this route fx700 or w4 later on this year


Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

[x_walkman]

kindly specify the strengths and weaknesses based from:

bass
mids
treble
soundstage

also hows the mids of w4 against fx700, is it more upfront?

might go to in this route fx700 or w4 later on this year


Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

well, it seems fx700 is much better than westone 4

Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

[KaliKot]

well, it seems fx700 is much better than westone 4

Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

Judging by feedback, it might very well be. I think I prefer the SE530 though.

Any westone 3 vs 4 comparisons?

[2rooi123]

well, it seems fx700 is much better than westone 4

Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

not really. it depends on your preferences. like usability,comfort,sound sig. id rate w4 a little bit higher than fx700 in terms of an overall product

[x_walkman]

not really. it depends on your preferences. like usability,comfort,sound sig. id rate w4 a little bit higher than fx700 in terms of an overall product

well, that's a good news

it's very much helpful to provide details, which is better in terms of highs, mids and lows   

[2rooi123]

well, that's a good news

it's very much helpful to provide details, which is better in terms of highs, mids and lows   

highs: w4 = very detailed and effortless w/out sibilance even at high volumes
fx700 = very detailed w/ a little bit of sibilance depending on the record and volume
mids: w4 = more micro detail than 700 and upfront though not as upfront as shure se535
fx700 = very good and natural but still cant compete with ba drivers though very close
lows: w4 = good extension and impact but lacks a little bit rumble around 20-25hz
fx700 = the bomb

[mbc0528]

youre calling the fx700 the bomb...
hahaha.

its the fx bomb!
yeah!

[2rooi123]

of course it has the best bass ever. that short cord just always gets to me...

[makubexXx]

any um3x - w4 comparison here?

[x_walkman]

youre calling the fx700 the bomb...
hahaha.

its the fx bomb!
yeah!

yeah, it's true,

comparing the fx700 and fx500 both are great in all aspects, the big brother have better details and mids but

the fx500 have deeper bass and more rumble against it    at the expense of mids and clarity

just my 2 cents

[x_walkman]

highs: w4 = very detailed and effortless w/out sibilance even at high volumes
fx700 = very detailed w/ a little bit of sibilance depending on the record and volume
mids: w4 = more micro detail than 700 and upfront though not as upfront as shure se535
fx700 = very good and natural but still cant compete with ba drivers though very close
lows: w4 = good extension and impact but lacks a little bit rumble around 20-25hz
fx700 = the bomb

now, i finally understand, i might like the mids of westone4, i'm thinking how good is the bass of it, the bass of um3x already satisfied me during the meets

how's the bass of um3x compared to it, thanks